- Get Involved
- Education & Events
- Publications & Research
- About ACA
Are We Getting More Young People to Camp?
All of us who work in camps believe in the value of the camp experience and wish that every child could spend at least part of his or her summer at camp. The American Camp Association (ACA) believes so strongly in the positive benefits of the camp experience that one of the Ends of the Association is to increase the number of children, youth, and adults of all social, cultural, and economic groups who can attend camp. This fall we again collected information to create a snapshot of how camps felt they did on enrollment for the summer of 2006.
Thanks to the camps who took time to complete the survey and to the encouragement given them by our local office executives, we had 624 camps complete the Web-based survey (23 percent response rate). The camps who answered the survey were representative of the ACA camp community in terms of type and affiliation and so provided an accurate view of enrollment (see sidebar on page 62). To have comparable information, we asked directors to indicate their total enrollment in camper weeks rather than total campers as a way to equalize different session lengths. For example, if one hundred campers attended for one week, that was equal to a hundred camper weeks. However, if one hundred campers attended camp for eight weeks, that was eight hundred camper weeks. The questions were almost identical to the 2005 enrollment survey; therefore, we can make comparisons across years. While the survey also asked questions about staff recruitment, this article discusses only the camper enrollment data.
Overview of Summer 2006 Enrollment
The overall view on enrollment from directors was that the 2006 summer season was a good summer for the majority of camps and slightly better than they reported in last year’s survey. Over 48 percent of the camps indicated that this summer was the highest or higher than most of the past five summers for enrollment, while another 23 percent of the directors thought enrollment was about the same. However, some directors (18 percent) provided a different view on enrollment when they indicated they had fewer campers this summer than most of the past five summers, and for some camps (12 percent), the 2006 summer was their worst enrollment for that five-year period. When compared to their potential capacity, almost half of the camps (49 percent) operated at 90-100 percent capacity. About a quarter of the camps operated at 80-89 percent capacity, and another quarter operated at less than 80 percent capacity. Over 70 percent of the camps were within 90-100 percent of their targeted enrollment for the 2006 summer. When compared to 2005 summer survey data, the trend indicated a slight improvement this year with 5 percent fewer camps experiencing decreased enrollments, and 10 percent more camps hitting 90-100 percent of their targeted enrollment.
One way to assess the impact of camp opportunities for children is to look at the number of summer camper weeks generated. Table 1 shows the distribution of camper weeks generated by the camps in the survey. Over 72 percent said 2006 camper weeks were equal to or higher than last year. When asked how much higher this year was for camper weeks, 54 percent said between 1-7 percent higher (see Map 1 on page 62). If they indicated they were lower on camper weeks compared to last year, 57 percent were lower by 1-7 percent (see Map 2 on page 62). When asked about enrollment in specialized programs (horseback riding, etc.), camps indicated that the interest was about the same as last year (60 percent) or higher (28 percent). This increased interest in specialized activities was 10 percent higher than reported in last year’s survey. It was interesting to note that 28 percent of the camps responded that they offered no specialized programs.
Some concerns have been expressed about the difficulty of getting the youngest children to camp as well as keeping them into their teens. Table 3 shows enrollment by three age groups: less than or equal to nine years old, ten to twelve years old, and teens. The majority of camps for 2006 summer felt their age group enrollments were the same or higher than the previous year. When we looked to see how much higher and lower enrollments were, we found generally larger percentages of positive changes in enrollment and lower percentages for decreased enrollments. For example, for ten- to twelve-year-olds we found 39 percent of the camps were higher by 1-3 percent, and 30 percent were lower by 1-3 percent. For nine years and under, we found 29 percent were up by more than 10 percent while 20 percent were down by 10 percent or more. For teens, a mirror image of change was seen. For example, 25 percent of the camps said their teen enrollments were up by more than 10 percent while 25 percent said teen enrollments were down by more than 10 percent.
We also collected data on how camps financially supported campers through scholarships, donations, etc. Similar to last year, most camps (87 percent) indicated their organization offered financial support of at least 50 percent of the camp costs to campers in need. The number of supported camper weeks was almost identical to last year with 66 percent of the camps stating they generated up to 199 camper weeks. Over half the camps said their financial support of campers had not changed from last year. In terms of actual dollars for camper support, 38 percent of the camps said they generated more than $25,000.
Lastly, enrollment of ethnic/minority campers and return rates of all campers were examined. Almost no change was seen in ethnic/minority diversity in camp with 75 percent of the directors indicating the same enrollment as last year. For returning campers, more than half the directors said they had return rates between 50-74 percent. Return rates seem very stable since 62 percent of the directors in the 2005 survey and 2006 survey said they had about the same number of returning campers. For camps with higher rates of returning campers, over 70 percent said they had increased by 1-7 percent. For camps who experienced fewer returning campers, over 20 percent of those camps saw decreases greater than 10 percent.
Does Enrollment Differ Based On Camp Characteristics?
People often question whether enrollment issues are different for day camps than resident camps, so we took a closer look at the information from that perspective. That comparison showed a few areas with meaningful differences. The five major differences in 2006 were related to: gender enrollment, specialized program interest, financial support for campers, perceived enrollment trends for the past five years, and capacity.
Last year’s survey indicated quite a few regional differences around session length, camper return rates, financial support of campers, and overall enrollments as well as differences around gender enrollments. This year, the regional comparisons were much more similar. The only areas of major difference were in session length, the magnitude of camper return rates, and the five- year trends.
The last analysis looked at the information from the perspective of camp affiliation (agency/municipal, religious, independent for profit, and independent nonprofit). This comparison showed a number of interesting differences:
Lessons Learned From the Enrollment Survey
Just as we saw in last year’s survey, the issue of camp enrollment is more complex than may initially appear. While the summer of 2006 was one of high enrollment that met many camps’ targeted enrollment projections and was close to capacity, for other segments of the camp community the summer was one of the lowest enrollment summers of the past five years. Several messages emerge from this study:
Thanks to the ACA camps who took the time to complete the study, we have valuable data from which to talk about trends and issues related to enrollment. We plan to continue to collect enrollment data and hope that even more directors will contribute their perspectives every March and October. Our hope is to provide camp decision-makers with accurate information that will help in the development of marketing and recruitment strategies and retention plans based on the most informed research data from the camp community. As far as whether ACA is making headway on its desire to increase the number of children getting a camp experience, these data suggest we are making some small gains but have much room to improve.