by Carl L. Harshman, Ph.D., and Tom Etzkorn, M.B.A.
While the people who sold you the land for your camp may have preached "location,
location, location" as the secret to your success, once you are
settled in and running your camp, we would argue that the real secret
to your success is "your staff, your staff, your staff." Actually,
we agree that location, program, management, and staff all contribute
to the vitality and reputation of your camp. At the same time, we would
argue that the best location and best program in the country will not
survive very long with poor to mediocre staff.
Jim Collins, the author
of the best-selling book Good to Great, argued that "getting the
right people on the bus" in terms of staffing was the essential
first step in the journey to greatness.
Understandably, not one
of us sets out to hire mediocre people. We're all looking for superstars.
The questions are (a) how to find them; (b) how to get them to accept
our offer; and (c) how to keep them or better yet, keep them coming back
year after year, if they are seasonal staff.
The Challenges of Hiring
If hiring people were that easy, we'd all be able to do it well
all of the time. We'd all have staffs that were fully engaged,
highly productive, and working together as a well-oiled, cohesive team;
we'd have very low turnover; and there would be no performance
issues or discipline problems.
That rosy picture of hiring is a little
like the family image communicated by the Cleavers in the late 1950s,
early 1960s television show Leave It to Beaver. It's ideal . .
. but just not reality. Hiring, especially in our competitive market,
is extremely hard work on our best days. It becomes more difficult on
our worst ones.
So how do we get better at hiring in an industry not
known for its glamour, fancy surroundings, or high pay? If we can find
the answer to that question, life and business would get better for all
of us.
Ten Tips for More Effective Hiring
Because there is no magic pill for
hiring and miracles are few and far between, we have chosen to look among
the experts and organizations that have discovered some of the secrets
to achieving better results from hiring and for reducing the downside
of potential hiring mistakes:
- Know what competencies are central to
the role you are filling. Be very specific and have a way to measure
the competencies in the screening-for-hire process. For example, a
counselor requires excellent communication skills with youth—it's important
to ask interview questions that provide feedback on an applicant's
competency in this area. Use this information to target and source your
potential new hire candidates to improve your chance of recruiting success.
It may be obvious, but you need to know what skills and competencies
you are looking for before deciding "who" is best to do it.
Do thoughtful research, have a plan . . . stack the deck in your favor
up front.
- Understand what contributes to successful job performance
in your camp. Do you believe that past performance is the best predictor
of future performance? If so, there are a number of circumstances in
which how someone performed in a previous job may be totally unrelated
to how they will perform in the one you are trying to fill. For example,
excellent performance as a counselor doesn't necessarily translate
into excellent performance as a supervisor—successfully supervising
former peers can be a difficult challenge. Don't just assume that
the past predicts the future—sometimes it does, but it often doesn't—you
have too much at stake and not enough time "in the heat of the
season" to deal with the problems of having hired the "wrong
person."
- Create a screening and hiring process that has multiple
stages and multiple measures along the way. A one-shot, gut-feeling
hire based on a single interview of a person recommended by a friend
(or a friend of a friend) is often the recipe for a personnel problem.
Do your homework; make hiring a thoughtful "team" effort to improve
your success rate.
- Be cautious of hiring someone "just
like you." Many of us have that tendency—why not, after all,
we know best. The more successful we've become and the more we
like who we are, the more we may be vulnerable to the "cloning" approach—that
is, a tendency to look for someone who fits our view of success and who
thinks and acts just like we do. In many cases, hiring someone like you
is a serious limitation to improving your product. In order to be successful,
a direct report may require different perspectives, needs, and attitudes
than the team leader or supervisor. In all probability, your camp will
function more successfully if different experiences and points of view
are represented in your camp's organization. Admittedly, managing
someone different from you can at times be a challenging task, but it
is often one that can pay large dividends in the end.
- Be certain that
the system and processes you are using to recruit, screen, and hire
are consistent with legal and ethical requirements. For a variety of
reasons, the law has become a major force in defining the requirements
for hiring people. Have good counsel in this area, and follow it. At
the same time, don't let the legalities manage the hiring process. Follow the
guidelines, but manage the hiring process yourself. Finally, be sure
everyone in the hiring process knows the rules up front as well as the
tips of how to gather and use the information you need . . . legally.
- In addition to assessing competency, build in a phase of the screening
process that gives you an evaluation of the individual's attitude
and motivation. Research on these little-known dimensions indicates that
they can account for 40-60 percent (or more!) of job performance. In
reality, your staff's attitude and motivation are the hidden key
to your camp's success . . . and . . . you can't see it on
a resume, you won't uncover it in a reference check, and unless
you know the exact questions to ask, you won't hear about it in
an interview. With such powerful factors impacting results, why not assess
for it as part of your screening and staffing process?
- Check references!
The legal context of hiring has become so risky that many employers
are hesitant to provide extensive or complete descriptions of a poor-performing
former employee based on the "who-needs-the-risk-because-they're-already-gone" assumption.
That is not a reason for failing to check references. Rather, it is a
reason to do two things:
- In the reference check, ask open-ended,
behavior-based questions such as "What did he/she do when . . .?" "How
did he/she respond to…?" "Give me some examples of…"
- Listen
for what is not said or how it is said. The person to whom you are speaking
is an employer, and they do not want to purposely mislead you. Sometimes,
in an effort to avoid legal hassles while not misleading you, they will "code" information
or purposely leave something unsaid that may give you an indication that
there could be a problem. Their tone of voice often tells you more than
what is said. If you are referencing a winning candidate, you'll
quickly know it.
Also, be cautious on the "giving end." For
the same reasons as above, be sure your team knows what to say if/when
they get a request to provide a reference on a former staff member. Don't
unintentionally put your camp in jeopardy by responding inappropriately
to outside reference requests. Develop a policy, orient the staff, designate
a "gatekeeper," and follow the rules. Remember, in the case
of reference checks, it's always better to receive than give.
- Keep accurate records of the screening process for each applicant
who enters the process. When doing structured interviews, for example,
have a template for recording answers and other information. When checking
references, have a standard set of questions you ask and ways to record
the answers in a consistent way. This assures that you will: (a) be
consistent in your policy and practice; (b) have consistent information
when comparing candidates; and (c) construct a historical database
for post-hiring evaluation of the reasons for good or poor performance
(and one you can use in improving your process from year to year).
- When possible, use a prescreening assessment to "thin the herd" of applicants. Many organizations
expend a tremendous amount of resources (time = money) screening candidates
who are not among the best. One camp screened over two hundred applicants
for about forty-five positions. The screening involved administrative
time handling all the paper, traveling and scheduling, individual interviews
by at least four staff members, and follow-up reference checks. The process
was a good one; the pool was too large. The camp could have made much
better use of its limited resources if they had invested their screening
resources in the one hundred best candidates out of the original pool
of two hundred plus. Don't spin your wheels chasing warm bodies
. . . use proven tools to help identify, recruit, and land your next
superstars.
- Build on your experience. Use this year's hiring
experience and outcomes to improve next year's process. For most
of us, the journey to excellence takes place one step . . . one person
. . . at a time. Putting together the best team for your camp is as much
an art as it is science, and requires patience, perseverance, and an
unrelenting commitment on your part to offer your campers the best—place,
program, and staff.
We began with the statement that there is no magic
pill for hiring. Believe us, if somebody had it, you would know about
it by now. We believe that you build an excellent staff one year at a
time based on studying best practices, understanding your camp—its
mission, culture, and standards of success—and learning from your
past experience. There's no doubt about it: hiring the best team
for your camp is hard work. But, it's always worth the effort.
After all, at the end of the season, the campers may talk about where
they went and what they did. . . but they always remember "who" made
it happen while there. We wish you the best in finding the best "who" available
for your team!
| Reference |
| Collins, Jim. (2001). Good to Great: Why Some
Companies Make the Leap . . . and Others Don't. HarperCollins
Publishers, Inc. New York, NY. |
Originally published in the 2007 March/April
issue of Camping Magazine. |