|
|
 |
by Bob Ditter
Lori, not her real name, has been directing
an all girls' resident camp in the southeastern
United States for over twenty years. While visiting
her camp in late May this year to help with staff
training, she mentioned to me that as many as
a dozen new staff hires did not show for orientation
week. "Bob, they never called, and most
never even e-mailed. When I contacted one who
we had hired to be our archery counselor, she
e-mailed us back claiming she had sent us an
e-mail months ago stating her plans had changed.
Bob, we never got that e-mail."
Lori's tale of "no-show" staff
is echoed by scores of camp directors I've
spoken to across the country. "Young people
today just don't take the commitment they
make in a staff contract seriously," a
day camp director in the Midwest tells me. "If
something better or last minute comes along,
they simply make a change in their plans and
think nothing of the fact that we are counting
on them. We hire extra counselors to work into
spots that are left open because of the drop-out
or no-show rate."
While the problem of
staff not showing up has been a perennial one
for camps, the current generation of young adults
is more likely to commit to a job offer later
and to ignore a commitment they may have made
in a signed contract or agreement then previous
generations. This trend has been building for
some time. One contributing factor has been the
Internet. Given the wealth of information and
choices available to young people on the Web — a
medium with which they have grown up — they
are accustomed to "comparison shopping." They
wait until the very last minute before making
a decision — regardless of whether that
decision is to take an apartment, purchase a
pair of shoes online, take a job they've
seen on Craigslist.com, or go out for the night.
In addition, many young people today came "of
age" with Instant Messaging and texting — which
are both forms of communication that allow one
to avoid more personal communication — like
an appropriate phone call when there is a potentially
embarrassing situation to deal with, such as
getting out of a commitment or asking to "hook
up." In his essay on "Modern Love" ("Let's
Not Get to Know Each Other Better," The
New York Sunday Times, June 8, 2008), twenty-one-year-
old Joel Walkowski notes that romantic relationships
among the young pointedly avoid commitment. "Casual
is sexy. Caring is creepy," he writes. "We've
grown up in an age of rampant divorce and the
accompanying tumult. The idea that two people
can be happy together, maturing along side each
other seems as false as a fairy tale. So when
a relationship ends, it isn't seen as bad.
It's held as evidence that it was never
any good to begin with." One wonders if
this hesitancy to commit is a general condition
in the world of Millennials.
Making the Cyber
Connection
So what is a camp director to do?
Aside from the long-standing practice of hiring
extra staff to cover the drop-outs and no-shows,
some directors have created a special staff section
on their camp Web sites where newly hired staff
are featured, along with their contact information,
once they sign a contract. (The staff page is
often password protected so campers can not access
the personal contact information of staff). The
goal is to help new staff "connect" with
other staff members and promote a kind of cyber-based
"peer group" or community that doesn't
need camp to begin forming.
Once a staff member
has signed on for the summer, the camp gets permission
to post that person's photograph and some
information about him or her along with the new
hire's position at camp. Since most young
people have a social networking profile, such
as on Myspace.com or Facebook.com, they are already
accustomed to communicating this way. Veteran
staff are urged to connect with new staff ("friend
them," as the social networking parlance
has it), thus developing what is hoped to be
a stronger commitment to the camp. "One
reason new staff members don't take their
commitment seriously," says one savvy camp
director in the West, "is because they
don't yet have a true connection to anyone
at camp. Camp isn't ‘real' yet,
so they think nothing of dropping out and moving
on if something better comes their way between
the time they sign a contract and the time they
come to camp. If we can get staff to connect
somewhat before camp, we're hoping it will
increase the chances they actually show up!"
Some
camps have followed the lead of their constituents
and have created their own camp staff page on
Facebook.com or Myspace.com. By simply "friending"
new camp staff through their already-existing
profiles (it is estimated that there are 75 million
users on Myspace.com and 35 million users on
Facebook.com as of September 2007, according
to the Teen Research Unlimited Web site, www.teenresearch.
com, in Northbrook, Illinois), the camp accomplishes
two goals: 1) the connection of all staff in
a cybercommunity and 2) the ability to peruse
the profiles of staff and make recommendations
about content that might not be in keeping with
camp values. Questionable content can then be
placed under "privacy" settings or
eliminated altogether. Camps that have created
such a user page assign a trusted, dedicated
key staff member to administer and monitor the
site both to promote ongoing staff communication
as well as to ensure that postings are appropriate
and consistent with camp values.
Setting up or
updating a camp staff profile page is best done
immediately after camp has finished the season
when the key staff has had a chance to sit down
and evaluate the performance of counselors. Several
camps have a long-standing practice of gathering
the supervisory staff for a few hours after camp
(before everyone scatters and gets caught up
in their post camp lives!) to compare notes and
decide who they want from among the staff to
ask back. Each staff gets rated by this leadership
team and choices for whom to invite back are
made from this list. High performing staff members
who are asked back are "refreshed" on
the camp's staff social networking site
and are also encouraged to think of friends whom
they think would perform well at camp. Many camps
have discovered that strong performers who develop
a high positive regard for camp (those who have
a true heart connection to camp!) are very selective
about whom they recommend. Since they know firsthand
what it takes to be successful at camp, they
are more likely to size up their friends before
suggesting they come to camp. Several directors
I have worked with over the years tell me that
having a high performing counselor refer a friend
is their best way of finding other strong counselors.
Developing the Teamwork Factor
A lot has been
written about the traits of the so-called Millennial
Generation — that generation of people
born after 1982 who have "come of age" since
the turn of this century. While it is easy to
over-generalize about any generation, and, as
a result, lose the differing characteristics
between people of different races, classes, or
cultural backgrounds, there are some characteristics
camp professionals have noted in their own experiences
with this age group that are worth noting.
In
her insightful book, Generation
Me, Jean Twenge
notes that because of the great amount of individualized
attention children of this generation have received — the
result of a perceptible movement to increase
the self-esteem of children that began in the
1980's — the young adults who become
staff members at summer camps around the country
are often self-absorbed and not the team players
of their predecessors (Twenge 2006). She refers
to the belief that many Millennials have that
they can (and are expected to) be anything they
want — a kind of "army of one." As
a result, many young staff who are new to camp
are not the team players their cohorts from previous
generations were. Once they get to camp the idea
of working together with a co-counselor with
a group of campers or on a team with various
other activity counselors doesn't come
naturally to them.
To counter this trend, many
camps are once again inviting staff to camp for
orientation earlier in order to put them through
a team-building regimen. Camp Alpine for Boys
in Mentone, Alabama, has done this for the past
four years. Their staff participates in a two-day
intensive challenge course/ team building program
that utilizes low and high ropes course elements
along with special workshops designed to develop
trust and teamwork among staff. I have witnessed
firsthand the profound impact this training has
on the level of openness among Alpine staff.
The focus shifts perceptively away from an individual
perspective to a supportive team mentality where
the men feel more comfortable to ask for and
accept help, admit vulnerability, speak up in
front of others, and generally support one another.
It takes an experience to create an environment
where the above named behaviors flourish, which
is why Alpine uses the ropes and challenge course
as part of the team building program. According
to Glenn Breazeale, Alpine's director,
the time and investment in the two outside facilitators
more than pays for itself in terms of the payoff
in staff performance.
Retaining Mid-Level Supervisors
Another staff-related issue for camps has to
do with retaining middle-level management — unit
and program directors or division leaders. Many
directors tell me that finding competent, dependable
young adults to fill key staff positions is one
of the most challenging aspects of staffing.
One camp director friend of mine from New York
said to me once, "People who are school
teachers or coaches often want their summers
free. If they come to camp they often have families,
which (at resident camp) require housing. And
young people who work their way up to a management
position are often limited in the number of years
they can give camp. You put all that time in
developing them and then they take it all with
them when they leave!"
Indeed, what was
once pressure for high school students to "build
their portfolios" as a way to gain more acceptances
to colleges and undergraduate education opportunities
has evolved into pressure for college students
to find internships as a way of enhancing their
application to graduate or business school or of
landing a better entry level position in a company.
As a result, key staff are less and less interested
in remaining at camp for fear of "falling
behind" in a highly competitive market.
One
answer, clearly employed by Jay Jacobs at Timber
Lake Camps (TLC) in New York, is a robust professional
development program. For the past several years,
Jay has assembled the key staff members of all
the TLC camps in the spring and has outside trainers
provide specific, practical professional development
around communication with staff, campers, and
parents; staff evaluations; motivating staff;
and so on. His key staff not only learn skills
they can apply at camp, but leave these trainings
with life skills. Many tell me they use the same
techniques in their jobs at school or at work
or even at home.
What key staff also need is
a new peer group at camp — one
they can count on for support and ongoing mentoring,
since they will need to distinguish themselves
in some ways from the peer group they will now
be supervising. Too many camps overlook this
reality and fail to provide the support to new
or young key staff members, then wonder why they
struggle in their attempts to supervise their
friends. Again, the ideal time to begin forming
a key staff peer group is in the fall when there
is more time for key staff to develop the trust
they need to be open and mutually supportive,
and while incidents from the previous summer
are still fresh and can be "debriefed."
If staff
are a camp's most valuable resource, then key
staff are even more valuable. Learning how to
identify them, groom them, and then help them
perform at a high level are all steps toward
any good camp achieving its mission with campers
and families. The stakes are too high not to
invest in your staff.
The Short List of Leadership
Essential Skills
Many key staff attain their
position by "coming up through the
ranks"— that is, by first performing
well as counselors or in other staff positions,
then being promoted to a division leader
or unit director. Nothing in their camp or
life experience up to that point has given
them the skills they need to manage other
people, especially people who may be the
same folks they socialized with in previous
seasons.
Having conducted professional development
for many camps, I can attest to its effectiveness.
I have also formed my "short list" of
essential skills that most managers, whether
at camp or otherwise, need to learn or improve
on. They are as follows:
- Early identification
of problems. Camp is short. If problems
are not identified and addressed early,
they can develop into bigger problems
or simply dominate too large a part of
the summer. Most supervisors wait too
long before making an intervention, either
because they don't
feel skilled or they are apprehensive about
confronting unacceptable performance, especially
if that performance is coming from former
camp friends. Supervisors must be good observers
and intervene early enough so that performance
issues can be addressed while there is time
to make a difference. Problems not addressed
also lead to poor morale on the part of staff
who are performing well and watch as some
cohort is doing a poor job.
- Validation.
Many key staff members don't know how
to properly validate the people they oversee,
a skill that is especially important when
confronting poor performance. One can validate
someone in many ways, as follows:
- Feelings
("I can see how frustrated you are
with your campers!")
- Experience
("I know it can be tough being new
here, as there are so many things to learn
at once. It can be overwhelming!")
- A person's situation ("I can
see that having cabin duties and having to
leave early to set up your activity area
for the day is pulling you in two directions.")
- Legitimate attempts to perform
("I
can see you're trying, and I appreciate
that!")
- A person's positive
intentions ("I know that when you kept
your campers up past bed time you were only
trying to get them to come together better
as a group.")
- Your contribution
to the problem ("I should have addressed
this with you earlier, and that's my
problem for which I take full responsibility.")
By validating others, we reinforce
whatever positive aspects of their
performance we can, thus setting
a more positive tone to the entire
conversation. We also prepare them
for the concerns that may follow,
increasing the chance that they might
actually listen less defensively
and take in what we have to say.
In this regard, validation is a master
skill, one that enhances other skills.
- Skillful confrontation. Many supervisors
avoid confrontation out of a fear of "making
things worse." What they don't
know how to do is
- Express a performance
issue as a concern ("I am concerned
that you aren't being as
successful as we all know you
can be!")
- Hook a concern to a
compliment ("I can see you really
have a lot of energy with your
campers! That's great!
My concern is that you channel
it in ways that are productive
so they don't get so excited
that they become harder to manage!")
- Ask whether what we observe
is something they have observed.
("Have you noticed what it is
I am describing to you?")
- Defining
performance in behavioral terms. One
of the most frequent mistakes supervisors
make with staff is not using clear language
that describes behavior. Too often we
give feedback in overly general terms
without giving specific examples of what
people do and say that we want to address.
- Scripting key
points. Do this before
heading into a conversation. Too often
supervisors provide feedback without
clearly organizing their thoughts. The
conversation, especially if it addresses
sensitive issues, may then become muddled
and tangential. Scripting out major points
or key phrases beforehand helps ensure
that the conversation stays on track,
even if things get emotional.
|
References
Walkowski, J. (2008). "Let's Not Get
to Know Each Other Better," The New York
Sunday Times. June 8, 2008.
Twenge, J. (2006).
Generation Me. Free Press, New York.
Originally published
in the 2008 September/October issue of Camping Magazine.
|