|
|
 |
by Michael Shelton,
M.S., C.A.C., C.E.T.
| |
| Let me be very
clear at the beginning of this article:
We must attract diverse audiences to
the summer camp experience if our field
is to survive. And though the term “diversity” is
applicable to many categories — religion,
sexuality, age — a primary focus
must now be on people of color from both
ethnic groups that have been longstanding
citizens of the United States and recent
immigrants. |
|
| |
|
The Camp Community Takes Notice
At the same time the 2008 American Camp Association
(ACA) national conference was taking place in
Nashville, the Pew Research Center made national
headlines by releasing a report that predicts
that by 2050 nearly one in five Americans will
have been born outside of the United States.
Additionally, new immigrants and their children
will account for 82 percent of the population
increase from 2005 to 2050. I read the USA Today
article covering this particular report while
at the conference, and later that day, as I walked
amongst the throngs of conference participants,
it was impossible not to notice that people of
color were almost non-existent. I wasn’t
the only person using this characteristic to
make comparative judgments. Almost every person
that I spoke to over my three days at the conference
was well attuned to the lack of people of color.
One month later in March 2008, the National
Parks and Recreation Association publicized the
emerging trends affecting recreation programming
in the United States. Working with diverse audiences
was identified as one of the most pressing needs
for the future of recreation. Ironically, in
the March/April 2008 edition of Camping
Magazine,
summer camp enrollment trends were addressed.
The analysis in this article found that for the
third year, enrollment of ethnic/minority campers
did not experience any significant growth in
any segment of the camp community.
Why the Delay?
Even if enrollment trends do not indicate an
increase in ethnic and minority campers, the
demographics of the United States is, nevertheless,
changing. The following is a list of the countries
that are the current largest sources of immigration
to the United States: Mexico, the Philippines,
China, India, Vietnam, the Dominican Republic,
Cuba, El Salvador, Haiti, Jamaica, Russia, and
Korea. To these, we must add longstanding ethnic
populations in the States, including African
Americans, Asian and Pacific Islanders, Native
Americans, and Latinos. Although in the recent
past only several states were the primary recipients
of this diversity, current trends find it spreading
more evenly across the entire country. Even camps
that have witnessed almost no immediate changes
in their surrounding communities will encounter
more and more diversity over the next decade.
Camps are not the only entities confronted with
demographic changes. Corporations across the
country have reaped the financial benefit of
diversity marketing. Such corporate luminaries
as Hallmark, American Express, Merrill Lynch,
JC Penney, Mattell, Hasbro, AT&T, and VISA
(to name just a tiny number) have all successfully
reached out to diverse populations. Indeed, these
(and almost all) corporate entities recognize
that survival depends very much on positioning
themselves as a purveyor of goods and/or services
for a heterogeneous population.
Why then are
so many camps behind the times in regard to working
with diversity? I postulate that there are several
possible reasons ranging from the benign and
uninformed to the intentionally prejudiced.
- In spite of the media and political attention
focused on diversity, particularly the immigration
issue, there are camp administrators who do
not comprehend the momentous changes occurring
within the United States stemming from diversity.
In short, they do not yet recognize the need
for change.
- Some administrators believe
that there is ample time to make changes in
their camps; in their perspective, there is
no need to rush.
- Others think that making
changes in their camps to meet the needs and
demands of diverse audiences will be a fairly
straightforward and an easy process that can
be accomplished rapidly. They too see no need
to rush.
- Camp administrators may be unsure
of how to begin the process and are waiting
for more direct input or direction; for this
group, the change process is too difficult,
and it is less intimidating and threatening
to simply wait.
- Some directors expect the
new demographics of the country to adapt to
camp traditions; these groups are expected
to make the majority, if not all, of the changes.
These administrators are waiting for diversity
to come to them on the camp’s terms.
- Sadly, some directors have no interest in
widening their programmatic scope; they have
been successful with their typical and longstanding
audience and have no desire to create change
that can impact their operations.
- Finally,
and a reason that cannot be denied, a few camp
administrators find diversity, particularly
people of color, as objectionable and unwelcome.
They purposefully make no effort to invite
diversity.
The ACA’s
Blueprint for Diversity
It was at the 2008 ACA
National Conference that the concept of a blueprint
to guide ACA’s diversity efforts was formulated.
It was decided that all levels of ACA needed
to address the challenge and opportunity of diversity.
Thus, we are promoting change at the national,
local office, camp, and camp director/administrative
levels.
The Camp Level
At the camp level, we
need to create an environment that is supportive
of diversity. We must not only serve new demographics,
but we must also assure that they have a positive
experience and wish to return in the future.
And, since word of mouth is integral for many
of the new groups we will be serving, we want
our newly satisfied customers to spread the word.
In my recent ACA book release Multiculturalism
in Camps and Youth Programs (2008), I present
an outline for camps to follow in working with
diversity. I’m choosing in this article
to discuss the one most essential endeavor that
supersedes all others: explore the underlying
assumptions that often silently guide our camps.
Let me explain. Educators often make use of an
illustration of an iceberg to teach the concept
of culture (see illustration
1). The level above
the water depicts artifacts that are most noticeable,
largely those occurrences that can be experienced
by our five senses (e.g., preferences in music,
clothing, and food). And it is these that are
targeted in most diversity efforts. For example,
in my diversity work with youth organizations,
most energy is exerted on the environment, including
modifying it to reflect different cultures in
decor, posters, bulletin board displays, and
decorations; participating in cultural celebrations;
and engaging in activities that reflect multiple
cultural perspectives. This is definitely a step
in the right direction, but this will not suffice
for success. Such changes target surface levels
of diversity but leave unaddressed far more important
but less obvious cultural dimensions.
The more
important changes must focus on characteristics
beneath the surface of our illustrative iceberg.
Beneath this surface reside fundamental differences
in assumptions, beliefs, values, and expectations.
Specific examples include the importance of family
and work, attitudes about men’s and women’s
roles, the roles of children and how they are
raised, and views about leadership. Let’s
give a very specific example: American camps
tend to work from a fundamental belief that children
need to learn personal responsibility and self-reliance,
and participants are expected to learn and demonstrate
these skills through our programming. But would
an immigrant family coming from one of the Asian
cultures — cultures in which the needs
of the individual are considered as secondary
to the needs of the family — be welcoming
of such a dramatically different concept of youth
development? Our camps may be teaching the opposite
of what these families desire.
In summary, youth
organizations, including camps, believe that
by making surface level changes they have done
their part. But it is only through re-examining
our underlying assumptions, beliefs, values,
traditions, and expectations about camp and the
camp experience that we begin to embrace the
significance of diversity. For if we naively
assume that diverse populations will come to
our camps and simply assimilate our preexisting
practices, we are headed for failure. Instead,
we must begin to explore the changes that our
camps will have to make in order to manage diversity.
Notice that the sentence does not read “changes
that diverse populations will have to make to
fit into our camps.” We are the ones required
to change.
Here are some suggested steps to contemplate
as you work on a diversity plan for your camps:
- Clarify the goals and outcomes of your camp.
- Clarify underlying assumptions inherent
in your camp.
- Identify the new demographic
group(s) that you intend to serve.
- Learn
how your program goals and outcomes match the
needs, desires, and expectations of these targeted
populations. Mutually determine what will and
will not work.
These sound like easy steps, but they are not.
They take preparation and diligent effort. Most
youth organizations find that it takes years
to accomplish meaningful success with diversity.
The Camp Director Level
If a camp director/administrator
wants to be a leader who is successful with diversity,
there are numerous levels of personal development
that must occur. Here are two core principles:
Acknowledge that Cultural Differences Exist
and Impact our Camps
We have already examined
the iceberg model of culture and now recognize
that most of our cultural challenges will arise
from the beneath the surface level of the iceberg.
Each culture has its own viewpoints, philosophies,
beliefs, values, and convictions; these are not
immediately obvious and neither are they often
openly addressed until some form of cross-cultural
conflict occurs.
Many of the customs and practices
that we take for granted in the United States
have no relevance to other cultures. Unfortunately,
many Americans do not believe that it is necessary
to learn about other cultures; the new demographic
groups are expected to make the majority if not
all of the change. Though the finding that Americans
know very little about other cultures is often
found in research, a recent National Geographic-Roper
study found that many Americans between the ages
of eighteen and twenty-four do not think it is
important to know a foreign language or to know
the location of countries that are prevalent
in current events (as cited in Garber 2008).
Develop Cross-Cultural Competence
Recognize
that we can increase our competence in working
with new populations. This competence is not an inborn
characteristic a person has or doesn’t have;
it instead consists of a set of skills that can
be learned and improved upon. There are now surveys
that measure our cross-cultural abilities as well
an ever-increasing number of training options to
develop these skills. ACA itself is gearing up
to offer camp administrators and staff targeted
training. Take advantage of these offerings, and
develop your crosscultural skills.
Diversity Is
Indeed Critical
Diversity is indeed a critical
topic affecting our lives, both in the personal
and professional realms. ACA rightly claims that
unless we begin to work successfully with diverse
audiences, the summer camp field will soon face
a crisis. The demographics that have traditionally
comprised our population are shrinking while
a multitude of new groups, many unfamiliar with
the concept of summer camps, are oblivious or
unwelcoming to our offerings. Fostering successful
collaborations with these new communities while
concomitantly maintaining a positive experience
for our longstanding camp populations is a challenge,
and without trying to sound alarmist or doom
laden, time is running out. We need to start
our work now.
Adapting to Diverse
Groups: Common Expectations
In researching
my book Multiculturalism
in Camps and Youth Programs: How Us and
Them Became Just Us (2008), I spoke to youth organizations
across the country. The following are the
four most common expectations I encountered
likely to challenge our work with diverse
groups.
- Often directors
express dismay over the apparent lack
of freedom that immigrant children are
offered. Their families simply will not
let them participate in a program no
matter how energetic the recruitment
effort. A familiar question is: "Why
are these families so restrictive?" Not
discounting the existence of some cultures
that are deliberately restrictive, it might
very well be that parents are responding
to their concerns over youth and youth values
in American culture. They hear about gangs,
high pregnancy rates, school drop-outs, and
even watch youth from their own ethnic enclaves
slip into typical Americanized ways of dress
and behavior and cannot help but fear for
the future of their own children. Their restrictiveness
is not a traditional cultural manifestation
but rather a response to legitimate concerns
for their children's well-being.
- Camp
administrators hold to an ideal of the "good
participant." Such a youth demonstrates
regular attendance, actively participates
in program offerings, and forms positive
relationships with group peers and staff
members. However, how does this apply to
immigrant youth whose parents have not had
the opportunity to learn English and therefore
require that their children assume many of
the routine responsibilities typically performed
by adults? These children may need to pay
bills, escort family members to doctors,
and even take on evening and weekend jobs
simply to assist in earning an income for
the entire family. This curtails their involvement
in our programs, and the uninformed may assume
that these youth simply lack the interest
to participate in our programs when, in fact,
they are deluged with a myriad of responsibilities
that may detract from their sincere desire
to participate.
- Camp administrators
also hold to an ideal of the "good family," defined
as those frequently involved in their children's
activities. Such an expectation tends to
marginalize many families in this country.
One director encountered this challenge within
his baseball camp. When teams from different
economic strata of the city competed, it
was obvious that parents from the middle
and upper income brackets were able to purchase
the very best in training and gear. Some
ethnic communities simply could not, and
neither could family members attend the games
due to work. Based on superficial observations,
it might be tempting to presume that some
of these immigrant groups simply did not
have the requisite interest in their children.
After all, look at how little effort the
immigrant families put into their children's
sports involvement. But a deeper analysis
reveals that economic factors are the real
reason for the apparent lack of family interest.
- When
interacting with individuals from other
cultures, stereotyping, the process by
which we attribute specific characteristics
to all members of a specific culture,
is common. However, we cannot assume
that all immigrants require the same
level of effort and intervention. A thirdgeneration
United States born Dominican youth may
have the same values, interests, and
goals as our typical campers. The low-paid
immigrant laborer who popularizes the
media of today is but one of many immigrant
manifestations.
|
Resources for Promoting
Diversity at Your Camp
- Teaching Tolerance: Founded in
1991 by the Southern Poverty Law Center,
Teaching Tolerance provides educators
with free educational materials that
promote respect for differences and appreciation
of diversity in the classroom and beyond.
www.tolerance.org
- Intercultural
Press: For twenty-five years, the premier
publisher of books exploring and celebrating
cultural diversity and the experiences
of working and studying abroad. www.interculturalpress.com
- The
New Americans: A public television series
that examines a group of immigrants as
they adapt to the United States. The
Web site for the program offers a trove
of riches, including a great diversity
quiz. www.pbs.
org/independentlens/newamericans
- Films
offer another way of understanding the
both the complexity and mystery of other
cultures. Consider renting the following
highly recommended and instructive films:
- Japanese Story (2003): The story
follows the evolution of a relationship
between a Japanese businessman and
an Australian female geologist who
leads him on a tour of the outback.
- Fear and Trembling (2003): A Belgian
woman encounters cultural challenges
as the only Western employee in a
Tokyo company.
- God Grew Tired of
Us (2007): This documentary follows
the travails of Sudanese refugees
to their new life in America.
|
References
Bialeschki, M.D., & Malinowski, J.C. (2008).
Summer camp enrollment trends. Camping Magazine,
46-53.
Dolesh, R. (2008). Trending Positive. Parks & Recreation,
3, 64-75.
El Nasser, H. (2008, February 3). U.S.
growth spurt seen by 2050. USA Today, 3A.
Garber,
K. (2008, March 10). The ignorant American. U.S.
News & World Report, 22.
Shelton, M. (2008).
Multiculturalism in camps and youth programs: How
us and them became just us. Monterey, California:
Healthy Learning Press.
Originally published
in the 2008 September/October issue of Camping Magazine.
|