|
by Gwynn Powell
Grassy fields, sandy shorelines, piney breezes, shady knolls . . . each
camp has its unique physical characteristics that combine to serve as
the stage for the camp experience. Just as in a theatrical play, the
role of the stage ranges in its function and style and can define the
scope of the experience. The physical environment of camp has the potential
to enhance or detract from the overall perceptions of the camp experience.
Three different areas of research - sense of place, place attachment,
and environmental competence - offer insight, which can be used to enrich
the planning and implementation of camp activities and may lead to greater
overall participant satisfaction and retention.
Sense of Place
Experience of place is a multifaceted interaction between how individuals
adapt to the environment, seek to enact the opportunities available in
the environment, and draw personal significance from the experience (Canter,
1997). Any type of physical setting has constraints or pressures (temperature,
size, danger, etc.) that cause adaptation and adjustment; at the same
time, the physical setting offers specific ways to achieve goals that
could not take place elsewhere (a specific ambiance or closer feel).
The combination of adaptation and opportunity contribute to the creation
of meaning for each individual. Sense of place evolves out of the interaction
of the three elements.
Action by camp staff has potential to influence perceptions of place
based on the form and function of specific spaces. By asking questions
of yourself and your staff, you have the potential to harness this information
to foster a stronger sense of place for your camp facility.
- Are there certain spaces reserved for particularly meaningful rituals
or traditions?
- Do places have names (as opposed to numerical designation) that evoke
a certain feeling or trigger an emotion?
- Do the lighting choices offer the ability to alter the mood in subtle
ways to cue the campers and staff that a mindset change is expected?
- Are the night sounds capitalized on and explained as soothing forces
rather than used to scare?
- Is the fact that a swimming hole might have frogs or water snakes
explained as a natural encounter with wildlife (and therefore treated
respectfully)?
- Are new staff members encouraged to express perceptions and ideas
about the potential use of space?
Place Attachment
The concept of place attachment is, on the surface, a feeling of emotional
attachment to a specific place; yet, it is comprised of a very complex
amalgamation of experiences and links. Attachments can vary, can be positive
or negative, and can be a mixture of responses to the environment and
responses to the encounters with people and activity in a specific space.
A specific research study examined a measure of "rootedness" in order
to predict college students' interest in returning to their hometowns
(McAndrew, 1998). The college students were asked to respond to a series
of statements, and their answers were examined for connections between
the role of family in choice of college, their desire to return home
after graduation, feelings of homesickness, and the distance between
home and school.
If the word "camp" is substituted for the word "hometown," an opportunity
is created to examine points that may shed insight into feelings of rootedness
that camps seek to provide for children and staff. The items would then
read:
- I am extremely satisfied with my present camp.
- I know a lot about the history of my camp.
- I could draw a very accurate picture of my camp.
- I have gone to the same camp my whole life.
- I love to reminisce about the places where I played at camp.
This practical insight suggests that it could be important for campers
to have an experience that meets their expectations (the basis of satisfaction),
to know the physical layout of the camp, to have a sense of the history
of the camp, and to have experiences they want to remember (with opportunities
to reflect and reminisce about them). Obviously, you want campers to
form emotional bonds with the people and places of camp, but breaking
the components of attachment into tangible goals and objectives could
make implementation much easier.
Environmental Competence
In a broad sense, the term environmental competence refers to one's
ability to cope with immediate surroundings (whether outdoors or not)
in a constructive manner. At camp, in a specific sense, the experience
of coping with the world of camp provides practice in the necessary life
skill of coping with the larger world.
Steele (1980) categorized environmental competence in terms of:
- social systems (sharing information, problem-solving techniques,
inter-personal interaction, rules and procedures to facilitate use
of the setting, norms which promote positive concern for the setting)
- practical skills (exploration and scouting of structure and possibilities,
making contacts quickly, matching self with the setting, adjusting
mood to space, quick personalization of space, creative custodianship
such as minimum-impact camping)
Pederson (1999) expanded the categorization within practical skills
to examine specific outdoor skills (building temporary shelters, building
a fire, identifying edible plants), way-finding (being able to follow
directions, finding alternative routes, navigating unfamiliar places),
and resource conservation (recycling, examining pollution impact). While
these skills seem most applicable to wilderness settings, the specific
application of way-finding applies everywhere. Being able to follow verbal
directions, getting lost and re-finding the way, and the generation of
alternative routes to accomplish a goal apply equally well to busy street
corners or complex building designs.
Think of the camp environment as a stage viewed through the lenses of
sense of place, place attachment, and environmental competence. Thinking
about these concepts and seeking to encourage emotional bonds and practical
navigation skills may serve as a springboard for new applications and
ways of encouraging improved life skills outside the camp stage.
| References |
| Canter, D. (1997). The Facets of Place. In G.
T. Moore & R. W. Marans (Eds.), Advances in Environment, Behavior,
and Design (Vol. 4, pp. 109-147). New York: Plenum Press. |
| McAndrew, F. T. (1998). The measurement of rootedness
and the prediction of attachment to home-towns in college students.
Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 409-417. |
| Pedersen, D.M. (1999). Dimensions of environmental
competence. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 303-308. |
| Steele, F. (1980). Defining and developing environmental
competence. Advances in Experimental Social Processes, 2, 225-244. |
Originally published in the 2000 September/October
issue of Camping
Magazine.
|