by Matt Brownlee and Rita Yerkes, Ed.D.
Adventure experiences for children and teens have been a part of camp
for as long as camps have been offering organized programming. In recent
years, the camp industry has seen an unprecedented growth in programming
additions such as high ropes courses, rock climbing, mountain biking,
mountaineering, and wilderness expeditions for campers.
Nationally, we have also seen increased interest in wilderness survival
and extreme adventure programming on television. Unfortunately, these
national shows have demonstrated a total lack of ethical responsibility
to the American public by using adventure programming for the purpose
of corporate profit and increased television ratings. As a result, the
public rarely sees adventure programming depicted as an effective tool
to enhance the physical, psychological, and emotional development of
our youth.
Benefits of Direct Participation in Adventure
Experiencesfor Youth
Adventure educators have documented the benefits of structured adventure
activities on camper development. Improvement of self-concept has been
primary for children and youth. According to research by Cuff, Leiberman,
Devos, and Radcliffe (Radcliffe, Prouty, and Schoel 1988), specific areas
of participant self-concept, such as development of positive identity
and self-satisfaction, are repeatedly noted as having increased during
post-test adventure program research surveys. Gass and Priest (1997)
further identified the benefits of participating in facilitated adventure
activities as — the development of new confidence in oneself, increase
in logical reasoning skills, increase in shared decision-making, and
improvement in problem-solving skills.
However, the most important and somewhat obvious component required
in order for campers to receive these benefits from adventure experiences
is participation in the adventure itself. Cuff, Leiberman, Devos, and
Radcliffe (Radcliffe, Prouty, and Schoel 1988) pointed out that adventure
program research control groups, who did not participate in structured
adventure activities, did not display significant improvements or growth
in self-concept. In addition, Kraft and Sakof (1985) found that the first
key element inherent to learning and growth from experiential programming
is that learners must be participants and not just spectators in the
education process.
The Challenge of Staff Training
Camp professionals have recognized that no matter how challenging and
intriguing these adventures may seem to the public, staff must be trained
in conducting these activities with camper physical safety as a priority.
Often our attention is drawn to the glamour of adventure programming.
We tend to forget how complicated it may be for camp staff to facilitate
adventure experiences for campers — while working to create not
only a physically safe experience but also one conducted in an emotionally
safe environment. In addition, parents remind us that not only do they
want us to challenge their children, but also facilitate their holistic
growth as well.
Creating Emotionally Safe Camp Environments
Although numerous benefits exist for campers in adventure activities,
emotional fear may prevent their participation. An emotionally safe adventure
program environment could make the difference of increased camper participation
and the realization of program outcomes. However, knowledge of which
techniques to use in developing this environment of emotional safety
is at the discretion of the facilitator. If an inexperienced counselor/facilitator
uses inappropriate or inadequate facilitation techniques with campers,
their emotional safety may be compromised and self-esteem damaged. This
could be detrimental to not only individual and group development but
also safety and program outcomes as well. In addition, the damage done
to campers by an uninformed counselor could not only have major impact
on them but to the camp’s ethical reputation as well.
It takes staff training, skill, and talent to create emotionally safe
environments for campers. The organized camp community has identified
this as an issue and has responded with recent articles such as Marla
Coleman’s (Camping Magazine 1997) “Coaching Emotional Skills
at Camp” and Denise Nelson’s (Camping Magazine 2000) “Building
Bunk Group Buddies.” In addition, when discussing developments
in staff training, Bob Ditter (Camping Magazine 1995) states that camps
have“ . . . become even more concerned and informed about the emotional
safety of campers (p. 40).”
Camp adventure facilitators have numerous choices from a variety of
disciplines in which to create emotionally safe environments for their
campers. Unfortunately, many camp adventure facilitators have not had
the training necessary to discern the difference. They techniques. They
may not know how to involve campers in determining their own individual
and group adventure program goals and outcomes to maximize the value
of these adventures to the camper experience.
Camp Responsibilityand Program Outcomes
The camp administration’s responsibility is to empower staff
with the responsibility of creating emotionally safe environments for
campers in their adventure programs and provide the staff training for
them to be successful. Coleman (1997) states, “When you arm your
staff with tools that nurture emotional competence, you forge a bond
in your camp community that empowers your counselors to have a profound,
positive effect on campers (p. 21).”
However, much of staff training has focused on technical activity skills
and planning the physical safety of the participants. Given the complex
responsibilities of camp staff in running adventure programs, perhaps
the weight of this responsibility often inhibits our adventure activity
facilitators from encouraging participant input when devising group goals
and standards of behavior within the group. Often, our camp staff do
what they have experienced themselves without really understanding the
process or progression that is needed to achieve program outcomes. Camp
staff doing “the ten-minute read and preparation” right before
conducting an adventure activity program delivery is rather scary and
often unproductive in achieving program outcomes. Campers may get through
it, but might lose out on reaching their maximum potential for success
in the process.
In contrast, Ditter (1995) concluded that effective precamp training
should include discussing child-related issues and coaching counselors
to work more effectively with campers. Camp directors may need to ask
themselves if they spend enough time on this topic in precamp training.
Do they allow time for more advanced training during the camp season
to help their counselors continue to develop facilitation techniques
that create emotionally safe learning environments for their campers?
Using Cooperative Goal Setting
Before camp or program directors begin staff facilitator training,
they may want to explore how cooperative goal setting can enhance camper
emotional safety. The goal of establishing an emotionally safe adventure
program environment is enhanced through co-creation of group goals. In
this environment, group members feel safe to contribute to and commit
to group goals. Research indicates that this shared responsibility may
be extremely valuable for individual and group program outcomes. According
to Pintrich and Schunk (1996), the most effective way to accomplish successfully
reaching any goal is for participants to be committed to the goals. Eggen
and Kauckak (1999) support this point when they indicated that “one
way of increasing commitment is to guide students in setting their own
goals, rather than to impose goals on them (p. 417).”
Developmental characteristics of campers seem to be a perfect match
to handle and foster co-creation through cooperative goal setting. Ball
and Ball (2000) cite that campers from ages fourteen to seventeen prefer
to set their own goals, create and keep commitments, and desire adult
roles. How the camp staff manages their facilitation skills to create
an emotionally safe adventure program environment is extremely important
with this age group.
Adventure program literature indicates that cooperative environments,
with goal setting present, are inherent to adventure experiences (Burgess,
1991; Radcliffe, Prouty, and Schoel 1998). Furthermore, the process of
assisting adventure groups in developing obtainable individual and group
goals has become a noted cornerstone of effective adventure facilitation
(Gass and Priest 1997).
Examining effective behavior in organizations shows us that cooperative
goal setting has been used to motivate workers and also improve performance
standards (Cohen, Fink, Gadon, and Willits 1992). Research also shows
that agreed upon goals can reduce behavioral problems, build trust, and
establish safe environments (Eggan and Kauchak 1999). For example, Eggan
and Kauchak (1999) stated “that students who adopt learning goals
persist in the face of difficulty; attribute success to internal, alterable
causes; take risks and accept academic challenges; and focus on personal
mastery (p.418).” It would seem that campers could realize these
outcomes as well. Therefore, the camp director’s challenge is to
devise staff training programs to enable their counselors to excel in
this area.
Training Staff to Facilitate Co-creation of
Emotionally Safe Environments
Parallel Process
Teaching staff to incorporate cooperative goal setting aimed at enhancing camper
emotional safety can be a natural part of annual precamp trainings through
a technique called parallel process. Parallel process is one of the basic
elements of training staff experientially and is as simple as modeling behavior,
or in this case the facilitation techniques that you want staff to utilize
with campers (Ditter, 1995). For example, camp staff would assist new counselors
in establishing their own emotionally safe environment for precamp training
and the season through cooperative goal setting. According to Ditter (1995): “One
trick is to make the number of staff in a group equal to the number of children
typically in a group or bunk at camp. This way the staff experiences exactly
what it is like to be a member of a group whose size is the same as one they
will later be leading (p. 39).”
Facilitation Technique
Other techniques can also be used at the beginning of staff training to enhance
the emotional safety of a group of counselors. Lesson plans should be created
for each facilitation technique and made available for counselors to use
prior to implementing activities. Staff then can simply transfer and utilize
these techniques with their campers in adventure and other camp activities.
Ditter (1995) has also advocated the need for experiential training
or active learning approaches as a key training strategy when working
with staff. For example, a facilitation technique such as the “full
value contract” can be used, but its co-creation should be the
responsibility of all participants in the adventure activity (Racliffe,
Prouty, and Schoel 1988). During this process the structure of the contract
may be predetermined by the facilitator, but the responsibility of filling
in the values of the contract is shared among the group. Guided by the
facilitator, the participants may create and recreate the appropriate
values and standards for behavior that are unique to their specific group.
Possible applications could include hand tracing activities and value
statements compiled onto large paper that could serve as motivation to
create group goals. The larger paper “full value contract” signed
by participants and facilitator is then posted for all to see.
Other Creative Techniques
The parallel process may be applied to the development of a “full value
contract” by a full-time or senior seasonal staff who facilitates co-creation
of this contract with counselors in training. Handouts, including facilitation
key points, coupled with discussions about expectations, can help begin the
transfer from training to application with campers. The result is a co-created
contract concerning emotional safety developed by staff and the counselors
obtaining the knowledge and expectations of applying this technique with campers.
Behavioral contracts can be developed to assist youth in developing
appropriate behaviors and deterring them from unwanted actions. This
technique can easily be applied to groups. After introspection, discussion,
and democratic debate, the group may devise a mission statement describing
their own emotionally safe environments and expected behaviors. Then
creative signatures, fingerprints, or verbal acknowledgements can seal
an individual’s commitment to these group goals (Eggen and Kauchak
1999).
These group mission statements can also be put onto badges worn by
staff (Coleman 1997). Encourage staff to wear their badges daily throughout
the precamp training. As campers arrive, counselors will be modeling
mission statement badges that campers will be making. Short lesson plans
should be available for counselors to facilitate the badge making.
Improving cooperation can be accomplished if a group shares a common
source of threat (Cohen et al., 1992). The common source of threat for
the adventure facilitator and the group could be individual or group
actions that may decrease the emotional safety of individuals or the
group. The group may write a short story. The goal in writing this is
to create a story in which a triumphant camper defeats the threat to
emotionally safe actions with agreed upon behaviors. This story can be
acted out, signed, and/or followed up with discussion and agreements.
Furthermore, the story can be read out loud by campers prior to their
group’s involvement in an adventure activity.
Coleman (1997) suggests creating a “courage show” involving
emotional skills in which camp staff star in main roles. In turn, the
process described above can simply be part of staff training and then
acted out for new campers. In addition, Nelson (2000) describes the importance
of building this camaraderie and unity among bunk groups. She states, “Campers
should help create bunk rules to enhance their self-esteem and to show
them from the beginning how they, too, can have a part in the decision-making
process of the team (p. 20).”
These plays aimed at addressing emotionally unsafe behaviors can be
developed with help from counselors, acted out by bunk groups, and performed
for the rest of the camp community. They can then be acted out again
and again prior to involvement in adventure and other camp activities
to increase camper participation and learning.
All of the above techniques to enhance camper emotional safety can
be facilitated with staff during training and lesson plans for each activity
can be kept on file. Furthermore, counselors should be encouraged and
expected to refer to these lesson plans as reminders of how to facilitate
these techniques prior to involvement in adventure and other camp activities.
Senior staff can assist in developing this lesson plan file during each
season and should continue to mentor younger staff throughout the camp
season. Not only will junior staff benefit but also senior staff as well.
Achieving Your Goal
In order for campers to actualize the benefits of adventure activities,
they must participate. Establishing an emotionally safe environment not
only contributes to camper individual, group, and program outcomes, it
also addresses the camp’s programming ethics as well. Using cooperative
goal setting makes sense and has the potential to improve group safety
through increased camper commitment to accomplishing individual, group,
and program goals. In turn, camper participation and learning outcomes
during adventure activities may flourish. According to Coleman (1997),
once emotional themes become part of your camp community, “You
will have carved out a valuable and vital role for the camp experience
because you will have created the ultimate climate for success — a
place where young people feel safe, loved, and capable (p.21).” Creating
emotionally safe environments at camp in adventure programming is one
way to achieve this goal.
Ask counselors to define the emotional and physical
risk that may occur if campers are involved in adventure activities
that are emotionally unsafe. Have counselors discuss personal stories
that relate to the topic. |
Use parallel process during staff training to demonstrate numerous
ways to facilitate the co-creation of emotionally safe environments.
Provide handouts and lesson plans for each technique that is used. |
Ask junior and senior staff to develop working lesson plans
that outline facilitation techniques aimed at co-creating emotionally
safe environments. Keep these on file and ask counselors to refer
to them in preparation for facilitating activities. |
Raise the expectations. Inform counselors that you expect them
to use facilitation techniques demonstrated in staff training before
the implementation of any adventure activity. |
Use co-created metaphorical stories, mission statements, plays,
badges, clothing, and banners that display agreed-upon group goals
and ground rules to uphold emotional safety during adventure activities. |
Follow this session of training with effective behavior management
training. Discuss the relationship between co-creating emotionally
safe environments and behavior management. |
| References |
| Ball, A. & Ball,
B. (2000). Basic Camp Management. Martinsville, IN. American Camping
Association. |
| Burgess, C. (1991).
The effect of cooperative and competitive environments on the interpersonal
attraction of participants in group initiatives. Dissertation Abstracts
International, (UMI No. 9203145). |
| Cohen A., Fink S., Gadon H., & Willits R.
(1992). Effective behavior in organizations. Homewood, IL: Richard
D. Irwin, Inc. |
| Coleman, M. (1997).
Coaching emotional skills at camp. Camping Magazine. 70(1),18-21. |
| Ditter, B. (1995).
New directions in staff training and development. Camping Magazine.
67(3), 38-42. |
| Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (1999). Educational
psychology. Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall.Gass, M., & Priest,
S. (1997). Effective leadership in adventure programming. Champaign,
IL: Human Kinetics. |
| Kraft, R., & Sakofs,
M. (1985). The theory of experiential education. Boulder, CO: Association
for Experiential Education.Nelson, D. (2000). Building bunk group
buddies. Camping Magazine. 73(3), 20-21. |
| Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (1996). Motivation
in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River,
NJ: Prentice Hall. |
| Prouty, D., Racliffe,
P., & Schoel, J. (1988). Islands of Healing. Hamilton, MA:
Project Adventure Inc. |
Originally published in the 2003 November/December
issue of Camping Magazine. |