|
by Prithwi Raj Subramaniam, Ph.D.
For most of us, summer brings warm feelings and we readily associate
summer with the camp experience. Camps have had a long tradition in this
country providing valuable life skills and motor skills to our youth.
The experiences, knowledge, skills, and attitudes youth gain in camps
function to supplement the influences of home and school (Guggenheimer,
Deming, Gucker, Sinn, & Welch 1945). As our nation battles with an
increasing rise in obesity among our children, summer camps may have to
take on other roles as well. Fifteen percent (almost nine million) of
children and teens aged six to nineteen years are overweight according
to the 1999-2000 data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC). The roles summer camps play in our children's growth, education,
and development have to be aligned with current health issues facing our
nation. How can summer camps offer a remedy to this serious public health
concern? The answer lies in the provision of a quality athletic program
that caters to the needs of all campers physically, emotionally, socially,
and psychologically.
A Quality Athletic Program
The mission statement of the American Camp Association (ACA) is enriching
the lives of children, youth, and adults through the camp experience.
The camp experience is a combination of a variety of programs provided
by camps to help campers grow and develop as individuals. Camps should
strive to make every program that is offered to campers an enriching experience.
According to ACA's values statement, the camp experience should promote
the development of "self-esteem, character, courage, responsibility,
resourcefulness, and cooperation" — which are important attributes
in every camper's growth and education. Camp administrators should use
ACA's mission and values statements as a guide in designing quality athletic
programs for campers. We need to understand that not all camp experiences
can enrich the lives of our children. In order to enrich the lives of
our children through the camp experience, camp administrators need to
pay close attention to the types of activities offered in the athletic
program — and the learning climate created in teaching these activities.
Quality athletic programs are developmentally appropriate and should
meet the developmental needs of all campers. Campers should be provided
plenty of appropriate practice opportunities to practice the skill being
taught. An athletic program that offers kickball does not ordinarily provide
ample practice opportunities for campers to be skillful. In a game of
kickball, children average fewer than two chances to throw, kick, and
catch during an entire game — and girls have fewer chances than
boys (Wilson 1976).
In addition to the provision for appropriate practice trials, campers
also need to experience success regardless of skill level. This is particularly
important with campers who are low skilled. When these youth experience
success, they are more likely to continue working to improve versus when
they continually fail (Graham, Holt/Hale, & Parker 2004). If we want
our campers to engage in regular physical activity and derive the health-related
benefits of physical activity, we need to think beyond kickball in our
athletic programs. Quality athletic programs also provide avenues for
cognitive, emotional, and social development in our campers.
The activities we offer in our athletic programs can have a profound
impact on the emotional development of our children (Guggenheimer, et
al. 1945). Activities that are developmentally inappropriate could lower
self-esteem, reduce confidence, and disrupt sound emotional growth. Dodgeball/bombardment
is a popular activity in most summer camps. This activity is considered
developmentally inappropriate (Graham et al. 2004; NASPE 2004; Williams
1992) by the National Association for Sport and Physical Education because
it is an elimination game and uses humans as targets. Campers who are
eliminated from the game are either low skilled or bigger targets, and
these are the very individuals who need to practice and exercise the most
given the health crisis we are facing as a nation. Dodgeball/bombardment
could be one of the contributing factors to the reason why low skilled
campers get turned off to future physical activity. In addition, this
activity does not help children develop positive values as it promotes
aggression and mob mentality. Moreover, there is too much potential for
injury, both mental and physical. Dodgeball is a lawsuit waiting to happen
(Vail 2001).
The Learning Climate
| |
| Resources |
| Grineski, S. (1996). Cooperative learning
in physical education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. |
| Kagan, S. (1992). Cooperative learning
(2nd ed.). San Clemente, CA: Kagan Cooperative Learning. |
| Midura, D. W., & Glover, D. R. (1995).
More team building challenges. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. |
| Putnam, J. W. (1998). Cooperative learning
and strategies for inclusion: Celebrating diversity in the classroom
(2nd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes. |
| Slavin, R.E. (1990). Cooperative learning:
Theory, practice, research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. |
|
The learning climate we create in teaching activities also can play a
significant role in impacting the cognitive, emotional, and social development
of our campers. Motivational research informs us that the type of motivational
climate one adopts and implements may enhance or hinder learning. There
are two types of motivational climates: (1) mastery motivation climate;
and (2) performance motivation climate. Central to the mastery motivation
climate is that effort will lead to success regardless of skill level.
On the other hand, performance motivation climate is based on the individual's
ability and sense of self-worth (Biddle, Wang, Chatzisarantis, & Spray
2003; Valentini, Rudisill, & Goodway 1999).
Programs that are competitive in nature (e.g., color wars) subscribe
to the performance motivation climate and only high-skilled children succeed
in this environment. Guggenheimer et al. (1945) warned us that if competition
is over emphasized in camp programs, it may "generate a false drive
that leads to anxiety, a sense of failure and the division of attention
between the apparent pursuit and the artificial reward" (p.2). Low-skilled
children also are made to feel like misfits in such a climate because
they do not possess the ability to succeed. Low-skilled children who experience
failure consistently in such an environment tend to have self-doubts about
their own ability and self-confidence.
A mastery motivation climate offers both high-skilled and low-skilled
individuals the opportunity to succeed at their own level. In order to
foster a mastery motivation climate, athletic programs should provide
tasks or activities that match children's abilities and skill level. In
addition, both high-skilled and low-skilled children have been reported
to enjoy learning in a mastery motivation climate (Biddle et al. 2003).
Camps Play a Pivotal Role
Camps can play a pivotal role in combating the growing obesity epidemic
among our youth. Taking on this public health issue is a major service
camps can provide to their communities. It is through the provision of
quality athletic programs that this vision may come to light. Athletic
programs that provide developmentally appropriate activities and learning
opportunities to all children regardless of skill level are contributing
to the ultimate goals of physical, emotional, cognitive, and social development
of the child. In order to foster positive values and cooperation among
campers, athletic programs need to include more cooperative activities
and eliminate developmentally inappropriate activities. Athletic programs
in camps also "should make the learning process and the development
of athletic prowess subordinate to sound emotional growth . . ."
(Guggenheimer, et al. 1945, p.3). Incorporating a mastery motivation climate
into athletic programs can enrich the lives of children and help develop
self-esteem and self-confidence. It is only through the provision of a
quality athletic program that the overall values and mission of the ACA
can be accomplished. Such a program will provide campers with the knowledge,
skills, and attitudes to be physically active individuals long after they
leave camp. Athletic programs that strive to increase the physical activity
levels of all campers are contributing positively to engaging our campers
in a lifetime of physical activity. In order to achieve this vision, camp
administrators need to "think out of the box."
| Ensure that quality athletic programs are developmentally
appropriate, meeting the developmental needs of all campers. |
| Provide plenty of appropriate practice opportunities
to practice the skill being taught. |
| Keep in mind that campers need to experience success
regardless of skill level. |
| Create a positive learning climate when teaching
activities. |
| Foster a mastery motivation climate where athletic
programs provide tasks or activities that match children’s abilities
and skill level. |
| Emphasize positive values and cooperation among
campers by offering athletic programs that include more cooperative
activities. |
| Make the learning process and the development of
athletic prowess subordinate to sound emotional growth. |
| Strive to appropriately increase the physical activity
levels for all campers. Remember, camps can play a pivotal role in
combating the growing obesity epidemic among our youth. |
| Understand that developmentally inappropriate activities
could lower self-esteem, reduce confidence, and disrupt sound emotional
growth. Adjust your athletic programs accordingly. |
| Positively engage campers of all abilities in your
camp’s athletic programming to impart a comfort level with athletic
activity that will remain with campers throughout their lives. |
 |
| References |
| Biddle, S.J.H., Wang, C.K.J., Chatzisarantis,
N.L.D., & Spray, C.M. (2003). Motivation for physical activity
in young people: Entity and incremental beliefs about athletic ability.
Journal of Sport Sciences, 21, 973-989. |
| Graham, G., Holt/Hale, S.A., & Parker, M.
(2004). Children moving: A reflective approach to teaching physical
education (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill. |
| Guggenheimer, F.L., Deming, E., Gucker, C., Sinn,
B.A., & Welch, E. (1945). The place of organized camp in the field
of education. Chicago, IL: American Camping Association. |
| National Association for Sport and Physical Education
(Fall 2004). Position on dodgeball in physical education. NASPE
News, 67, 4. |
| Vail, K. (August 2001). The demise of dodgeball.
American School Board Journal, 22-25. |
| Valentini, N.C., Rudisill, M.E., & Goodway,
J.D. (1999). Incorporating a mastery climate into physical education:
It's developmentally appropriate! Journal of Physical Education, Recreation
& Dance, 70, 28-32. |
| Williams, N.F. (1992). The physical education
Hall of Shame. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance,
63, 57-60. |
| Wilson, N. (1976). The frequency and patterns
of selected motor skills by third and fourth grade girls and boys
in the game of kickball. Unpublished master's thesis, University of
Georgia, Athens. |
| Prithwi Raj Subramaniam, Ph.D., is an associate
professor at the Department of Health Promotion and Physical Education,
Ithaca College, Ithaca, New York 14850. He worked as a program director
for a residential camp in Maine last summer. |
Originally published in the 2005 July/August
issue of Camping Magazine. |