What Does Camp Do for Kids? Appendix C
Purpose
-
increase statistical power
-
resolve uncertainty
-
improve estimate of effect size
-
answer questions not posed at the start of individual trials.
Study Design
-
Protocol
-
criteria for inclusion
-
methods to be used
-
-
Literature Search
-
consult electronic databases
-
reviews
-
textbooks
-
experts in the field
-
review references in trials found
-
-
List of Trials Analyzed and Log of Rejected Trials
-
generate list
-
enumerate and reason for exclusion
-
-
Treatment Assignment
-
record method of control in primary study
-
pooling of randomized vs. non-randomized data
-
-
Ranges of Characteristics and Treatments
-
present range of subject characteristics in primary studies
-
present range of treatment methods in primary studies
-
Combinability
A major issue in pooling data is whether the results of separate trials can be meaningfully combined. (451)
-
Criteria detailed
-
Measurement of homogeneity
Control and Measurement of Potential Bias
-
Selection Bias (blinding technique for accepting and rejecting)
-
look at methods only
-
code method and result separately
-
-
Data-Extraction Bias
-
proper blinding of extraction process
-
multiple coders or statistical validation of primary coder
-
-
Source of Support Stated
Statistical Analysis
-
Statistical Method
-
any recognized technique
-
no simple addition of successes across trials
-
-
Statistical Errors
-
awareness of Type I
-
awareness of Type II
-
-
Confidence Intervals
-
of difference between success rate of treatments
-
-
Subgroup Analysis
-
purpose of meta-analysis
-
Sensitivity Analysis
-
-
depends on statistical test chosen
-
data combined to give different conclusions
-
-
Quality Assessment
-
methodologic rigor
-
scientific quality
-
randomization process
-
measurement of subject compliance
-
blinding of subjects and observers
-
statistical analysis
-
handling of withdrawals in primary studies
-
-
Varying Methods Sensitivity Analysis
-
to establish result spectrum
-
-
Publication Bias
-
calculate number of negative studies needed to refute findings
-
published vs. Unpublished
-
Application of Results
-
Caveats
-
how should results be used/focus of observation and recommendation
-
opportunities for research
-
research method refinements that are needed
-
-
Economic Impact
-
of adopting new methods
-
Remaining Problems
-
appropriateness of meta-analysis
-
efficacy established through definition and design
-
role exists when definitive randomized trial impractical or impossible
-
gives quantitative estimates of weight of available evidence
-
-
meta-analysis question stated and relevant
-
Limitations
-
location of primary studies
-
statistical analysis
-
publication bias vs. study quality
-
-
Sufficient Information for Reader Conclusion About Validity
-
Scientific Rigor of Meta-Analysis
-
clear question
-
clear method to be used
-
intraobserver and interobserver variability estimates
-
identify and minimize bias
-
establish validity of pooling
-
Sources:
Sacks, H. S., Berrier, J., Reitman, D., Ancona-Berk, V. A.,Chalmers, T. C. (1987, February 14). Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. The New England Journal of Medicine, (316), 8, 450-455.
Cooper & Hedges, 1994.






